Hello Marck,

Sunday, May 16, 2004, 6:51:02 PM, you wrote:

MDP> I have to comment. Patrick has his opinion. That's fine. But it
MDP> lacks a certain level of information about the process and
MDP> management of a software development project.

I love comments, that's why we are here, to talk about TB.

MDP> Consider how many programmers work on each feature. Say there are
MDP> three in the team, each with areas of responsibility. One works on
MDP> IMAP while another implements virtual folders and another works on
MDP> HTML. RIT have four main programmers. Some features are implemented
MDP> quickly and appear, therefore, to "take precedence". This is not the
MDP> case. It is merely the result of different development time-scales
MDP> crossing and giving the less discerning eye reason to doubt.

that makes sense, especially with a small shop like Ritlabs, as opposed
to the megalopolis of M$. I've seen some of the easter eggs imbedded in
MS crap.. and I do mean CRAP.

MDP> IMAP certainly does have a very high priority but is taking a long
MDP> time to get right. Would you have the other programmers sent home
MDP> until it's finished? I don't think so!

or, if they were done with their part, why not all work on IMAP, since
it seems to be taking the longest time to implement ?

MDP> I can understand people becoming impatient when developments take
MDP> too long and it looks like they are being sacrificed to
MDP> trivialities. But I do want to point out that my understanding is
MDP> different and that I believe myself to be well informed on this
MDP> topic.
I'm not impatient for IMAP, I gave up on it. I also retired from a job
where it would have been much more critical to my needs, and I can see
where others are waiting for those very features, and getting very
frustrated. Informed is one thing, having Rit keep us in the loop ( or
not) is another.

MDP> I have nothing to discuss with regard to Patrick opinions, I just
MDP> wanted to set the record straight.

but you just did discuss it ;0). I value your thoughts more than his,
but sometimes the devils advocate comes out in me..
and you are right, I might be too critical of features I might not want
right now ( virtual folders for instance), when something like IMAP has
not been finished. I gave up a perfectly good email account ( IMAP)
because it became worthless to me, since I couldn't make it work with
TB. Luckily it was a free account, didn't cost me anything, except time
to move lists, and my time to setup more filters...Others don't have
that luxury.

-- 
Best regards,
 Paul  
Using The Bat! v2.10.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 1
Apr2004 (4.1.396)  (avast! version number)
0420-4 (14.05.2004) (avast! DB version number)
4.1.396 (avast! plugin version number)                          


________________________________________________________
 Current beta is 2.11 Beta/5 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Reply via email to