Hello tbbeta200409203600, Monday, October 25, 2004, 2:42:37 PM, you wrote:
> That's your interpretation -- and it's plain wrong. TFM does *NOT* > state %Wrapped should behave differently when used with parenthesis > or quotationmarks, respectively. Why don't you SIMPLY open the helpfile instead of going into lengthy discussions with me? Its all THERE, here: --- cut --- WRAPPED = "text" ...insert text wrapped as specified by the default editor settings. You can freely use template macros from this list within the text. This macro is very useful when using a lot of macros to generate the text and want that text to be well laid out. For best effect, place the %WRAPPED="text" macro at the beginning of a new line WRAPPED(limit, "text") ...macro for more precise text wrapping. Set value of Limit to the number of symbols were you want auto wrapping to be done --- cut --- > You can vainly argue whether -- as I quoted from TFM -- You don't even read what information is at your hands, read whats in the HELP file and what I already wrote, yet you keep up argueing where there is no need to argue, because after: > | new syntax for macros: it is now possible to use brackets instead > | of ="..." follows: "(in some cases it is now required, for example in macros with more than one parameter)" ...and I already did quote that three mails ago. And if you look at the "parenthesis-version" of the %WRAPPED macro now you'll easily see (be afraid!) - it has more than one parameter, and that is 1. limit and 2. text, and thus is *requires* parenthesis. Now we could argue if its logic or not, that if you pass only one parameter, you can't use the parenthesis version, but thats a different story, and IMHO it has to do with preserving compatibility to older versions, and that is a good thing. It behaves differently when you use parenthesis. That may be why MaxXx has the problems he has, and thats what I said in my very first reply to him, but you successfully keep ignoring that. Congratulations. > means implies "possible to always use", which makes a lot of sense, or > "possible to sometimes use", which would lead to the unanswered > question: where then? Well, if the macro has more than one parameter - as stated in the helpfile. *SIGH* > Got it now? Ask yourself, man. -- Best regards, Alexander mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
