Hello MAU,

On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 19:02:17 +0200 GMT (30/10/2004, 00:02 +0700 GMT),
MAU wrote:

M> I must admit it looks like quite a slow process. Anyway, as a workaround
M> if you are filtering on umpteen email addresses with umpteen OR
M> conditions (as you seem to say),

Correct.

M> I would suggest using special AB/Groups for that. I think it is a
M> bit more "elegant" and easier to manage solution. I have 3 groups
M> for this purpose, one with over 2000 addresses. I just can't
M> imagine how long would it take me to open a filter if I had done
M> over 2000 ORed conditions :)

Did I understand you right: Your filters match on "is in addressbook",
and adding addresses to the AB is fairly fast? If so, I will try that
workaround for the one or two major filters. I don't think I will
create 73 AB groups and redo all my filters...

Can you confirm the delay of opening filters and adding new conditions
when the number of conditions increase? With a confirmation, I can
open a bug report.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Early to rise and early to bed, makes a man healthy but socially dead.

Message reply created with The Bat! 3.0.1.33
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 2222 A 


________________________________________________________
 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Reply via email to