Hello Marcus, Sunday, November 14, 2004, 11:02:53 AM, among other things, you wrote:
>> My suggestion is that in the case of finding Parked Duplicates the >> programme would not automatically delete one of the messages but >> merely DETECT it, and display an appropriate warning which would >> give the user the option of MANUALLY deleting one of them, or of >> declining to do so. MO> IMO, this should be the case not only for parked messages but for MO> every message. See MO> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=2041 and add MO> your notes. Will do. I was not aware of this entry. MO> See also my note added October 21, 2004, quoting Ian. Although I would MO> prefer a truly reworked duplicate killer, Ian's suggestion is MO> acceptable and probably pretty easy to implement, in contradiction to MO> my original suggestion. Will look at this too. MO> And why not include an option to look for parked MO> messages as well, just as Dierk suggested in MO> <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>? And this MO> Now, how should we get someone from Ritlabs to finally comment on MO> this? Why not try to contact 9Val direct? -- Best regards, Roger Flying with The Bat!, version 3.0.2.4 Rush, and antispam BayesIt! 0.7.4 on Windows ME, version 3000, Build 90 ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.0.2.7 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
