Hello Marck,

Thursday, January 20, 2005, 4:14:48 PM, you wrote:
M> Just to pick you up *right* there my friend, there is an extremely
M> good reason why TB does it the way it does it and why it is not
M> wrong. Far from it. It is absolutely correct. Imagine a digest with
M> multiple messages and multiple signatures. TB *has* to consider
M> only the final cutmark otherwise all text below the first cutmark
M> would be displayed using the signature font / style / colour (which
M> in my instance is grey). Digests become hard to read and hard to
M> reply to.

Excellent point... I'd completely forgotten about that! Thanks.



-- 
 __    ____  ____  ____   TBUDL/BETA/DEV/TECH Lists Moderator / PGP 0x6C0AB16B
(  )  ( ___)(_  _)( ___)  TBUDP Wiki Site: http://www.PCWize.com/thebat/tbudp
 )(__  )__)  _)(_  )__)   Roguemoticons: http://PCWize.com/thebat
(____)(____)(____)(__)    PCWSmileys: http://PCWize.com/thebat/pcwsmileys.php

Tagline of the day:
If it weren't for the last minute, nothing would get done.




________________________________________________________
 Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Reply via email to