In reply to <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
D> Hi Avi, D> Saturday, February 12, 2005, 11:34:40 PM, you wrote: AY>> Pardon me, Marck, but IMHO this is an entirely legitimate question for AY>> a beta tester to ask. Also, IMHO, the "answer" you cite is no answer AY>> at all - rather, it borders on being an insult. D> I won't speak for Mark. Although the question may be legitimate. The point being D> made here is that this topic was a rather lengthy topic not that long ago. We D> did have some input I believe from Maxim - please correct me if I'm wrong here D> anyone - It basically boils down to there is a major re-write going on and D> rather than receive the beating over sending out a buggy beta. Like they have in D> the past. The team is waiting for a product worthy of beta testing. D> I've been on this list a long time. We beat them up pretty good for sending out D> buggy beta's. Telling them how to act responsibly. It appears they took our D> advice. IMHO we are getting the fruits of our ______ insert your own words D> here for the translations can be different... D> This of course is my perception of the immense conversations that have been had D> regarding this subject over the last several months. D> No disrespect was intended on my part. Just the facts as I saw them :) We just want to know about their progress, if their near to release a beta or they still need to work it out for beta release. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias What does this do, Mr Woof? ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
