On Thursday, February 17, 2005, 12:34, Allie Martin wrote: > If you really love TB!'s features, then you'll not find a client good > enough to replace it, so if you look for better working IMAP than what > TB! currently offers, you'll find it, but then, you'll lose not being > able to work with some of TB!'s nice features. This is the case for me > with ThunderBird.
Speaking of TB! and IMAP, I have myself considered switching to IMAP, but I am quite afraid of the reports of mailboxes emptying themselves. IIRC, you Allie has stumbled across this showstopper at least two times. Do you - or anyone else - know what has been done to improve the stability of TB!'s IMAP support? Are there any other major showstoppers I should be aware of before trying out IMAP? I am mainly interested in the risk of loosing emails, small annoyances does not bother me at this stage. Oh, I almost forgot the problem with remote outboxes. This does IMO qualify as a major bug, sending multiple emails is almost as bad as loosing emails. -- Regards, Marcus Ohlstr�m Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 PGP Public Key at http://www.canit.se/~marcus/pgp.asc ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
