In reply to <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
KT> Hello Goncalo, KT> On Sunday, February 27, 2005 you wrote: >> Why not integrate, as an option, the IE engine into the TB? You >> don't want to use it, fine, stick with internal render engine. >> People who don't mind do as they want to. KT> No. This would be a security flaw, and would influence not only KT> the ones that turn the option on, but also the others. Besides KT> IE's engine is quite old and relatively poor. I tend to disagree. If it's old and poor I don't really know, what I know is that it renders better looking pages than Firefox 1.01. I don't see why it would be a security flaw if you could determine which engine would render your html emails. KT> Ritlabs used to use an external HTML viewing engine and dropped KT> it. I'm not sure if they would be in favour of using another 3rd KT> party software for that. If they did, however, I'm quite sure this KT> should rather be Gecko -- since Presto is not embedable (I made KT> this word up, sorry ;D). Dunnow. Don't care about their tech choices as long as the result is good. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias Yes my son, long ago mail was read 1 packet at a time. ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.0.9.2 Pre-beta | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
