Alexander,

Trying to stay out of trouble with the moderator here.  Can I have folder 
specific settings relative to html?  No.  Must be done in the
message view menu.  Will TB need to be reset back to html next time I send a 
message?  I suspect.  Speaking of frustrations, to not be able to use a 
capability that TB clearly has even when everybody else should have the same 
capability, and then to be invited to not offer to discuss the issue because 
(by implication) others have already contributed everything I could think of.  
But we should accept our frustrations.  They are part of living.  Right?

>> I  did  but  I though they were "cleaning" the house, I didn't realize
>> the  mess that was coming just to get a pretty customizable interface.
>> This betas are so unstable that I don't even dare to unzip 'em.

> Problem seems to be that it makes no sense to fix old issues now and > THEN 
> add a new GUI that requires adapting tons of things to it later 
> (things that were working or are fixed now could be broken again, as it is > 
> happening right now & frustrates people). The chosen path is correct 
> given that a new GUI is wanted/needed.

One way to write software is to decide in advance every feature that a program 
will have and to not allow this to be changed once it has
been established.  Makes for great efficiency, and you can be assured that 
software writers try to do it that way.  But what happens is that we learn 
about the needs of the program and users as we go along, and we see that 
competitors have devised a feature that it is hurting us to not include.  The 
"in advance" way is great theory, but it doesn't work in the long run.  

My experience tells me that changing the interface does not generally require 
great changes to the internal workings of the program.  

I am reminded of a similar discussion I have had with Slaven of Pocomail.  I 
even used TB as an example of a relatively complete email implementation that 
he could emulate, rather than adding unfinished product after product.  No, he 
was not happy with me.  The path of the most money is the path he chose.  The 
unhappy truth is that features sell software.  Fixing things that don't work 
right makes current users happy, but they aren't buying new software.  Another 
frustrating reality.  I recommend it to you.

-- 
Gleason
Using The Bat! v3.0.9.17 Return on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600
Service Pack 2


________________________________________________________
 Current beta is 3.0.9.17 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Reply via email to