Hallo Peter, On Thu, 12 May 2005 12:46:46 +0200GMT (12-5-2005, 12:46 +0200, where I live), you wrote:
FG>> TB is VERY fussy about the format of its date fields, and I regularly FG>> get Created dates years in advance (or behind) of the current date. FG>> Its a known "feature" of TB date handling. PF> OK, thank you. Maybe we should wish for less fussy date handling on TB!'s part? I guess the real problem isn't TB, but non RFC-compliant clients are. Over here we pay with euros, when the local grocer starts quoting his prices in dollars and I don't understand that, then it's not me who has to get less fussy, but it's the grocer who has to use well defined standards. Same goes for the Date: header in messages. It's an obligatory header field, anything that sends mail should get that right. -- Groetjes, Roelof Don't worry, I'm go�ng t� b�ckup t�d��!&%#~% The Bat! 3.5 Return RC8 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN
pgp4hUr1pF9Ix.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.5 Return RC/8 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
