Hello Roelof! On Thursday, May 12, 2005, 6:37 PM, you wrote:
>>> ... there's an easy reason for that of course. When you store >>> attachments separately the file (with its correct name) already >>> exists, when you store attachments in the message, before you can >>> open the file there needs to be generated a temporary file first, >>> for that temporary file a random file name is used. MB>> ... now the question is, Is that technically necessary? > No, of course it isn't. ... < ... > > The only risk you've got is that two (or more) applications all try to > use a temporary file with the same name or even that you're trying to > open multiple attachments with the same name with TB just to see what > changes were made. In those cases it could become problematic. But > those things can be caught, though rewriting everything might be a > hassle. I see. Thanks for the good explanation. MB>> Would changing it be a major code-writing task, or is it something MB>> that could be changed easily? > Can't say anything sensible about that. Well, obviously, me neither. :) MB>> Always provided, of course, that enough user support would be MB>> there for the change. > I think there is. Well, we can see what happens. I think Martin Schoch is going to write a report on Bug Tracker about it. I hope he will place it on the Wish List, where it actually belongs and will get proper handling. -- Best regards, Mary The Bat 3.5 Return RC9 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.5 Return RC/9 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
