Hello Martin Schoch & everyone else, on 13-Mai-2005 at 17:38 you (Martin Schoch) wrote:
>> Anti-Aliasing for fixed size, ie. non-vectorized graphics? I don't think XP >> does that, other than the cleartype thing for the on-screen fonts. > So why are the icons very ugly on Win2k and Win98 systems but not on > XP? Must be then a problem how graphics are displayed. The icons > file seems to be PNG - so there must be a difference between OS's. Maybe it has to do with the "themes" capability of Windows XP. I don't know. >>> As said - in version 3.0.2.8 or 3.0.2.10 the icons are displayed very >>> well. >> Those version were not using the new GUI system at all, that may be why... > And this GUI system has display problems on Win2k and Win98 > systems... I see what you mean here on my system, too, though not as drastic as it is in the screenshots you provided. Does it improve when you change the background color of your Windows to a lighter or darker color, maybe? The "anti-aliasing" that is done on the icon art may be dependent on the color. -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) With regard to electric light, much has been said for and against it, but I think I may say without fear of contradiction that when the Paris Exhibition closes, electric light will close with it, and no more will be heard of it. -- Erasmus Wilson, professor at Oxford University, 1878 ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.5 Return RC/9 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
