Allie, >> I'm currently using 10 concurrent connections.
> Do you really get a better performance with 10 as opposed to 4 or even 2 > connections? Just curious. A periodic mail check for me is 4 pops and synchronizing 3 of my imap folders. With 10 connections, this is normally done in less than a second. With 5 connections, this will take 2 or 3 seconds. However, if you have only two servers to check, you could very well get the same top performance with 2 connections. > I've been experiencing reliable operations here for 48 hours going. No > forced restarts or AV's. This is truly remarkable and unprecedented > since I started using IMAP and TB! No restarts for me either. I have not been having the AV problems that others have. >> no notes attached to messages. Primitive message editor. > I like Mulberry's editor. I'm not sure why you call it primitive. :) Let's see, TB has 26 buttons on the html formatting toolbar. Mulberry has 9. Also many more buttons in the main tool bar and more menu options. Plus TB offers a choice of three different editors. No other email software that I have looked at has more than one. >> It is true that Mulberry has the most trouble free and complete >> imap implementation available. > For an IMAP user, this comes first and *always*. This is true for me too. Until RIT started to get the task manager bottleneck worked out, TB was unusable for me. -- Gleason Using The Bat! v3.5 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Primarily using the Fastmail IMAP server which uses Cyrus. ________________________________________________________ Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
