Hello Simon, On Tuesday, June 07, 2005 at 22:48:59 GMT +0100 (which was 23:48:59 where I live), Simon Fincham wrote and made these valuable points on the subject of "BayesIt or Bayes Filter?":
> Hi Dick, > On 07 June 2005 at 20:18:09GMT +0200, Dick Hoogendoorn sent an E-Mail > mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on the subject of "BayesIt or > Bayes Filter?": Dick>> I gave up on both products and installed Spambayes a few Dick>> months ago. Never let me down and I only trained it for about Dick>> one week and since then there is hardly a spammail that will not Dick>> be classified as such, in the worst case it's classified as Dick>> Unsure and ends up in my Unsure folder. > I've read with interest your experience with 'Spambayes'. I previously had > good results with 'Popfile' but found it to be slow and resource intensive, so > in search of an integrated solution went back to 'Bayesit'. > After training 'Bayesit' with a large base it still refuses to capture > 'obvious' Spam messages - so, I'm going to try 'Spambayes' and see what it can > do. > Thanks. Simon, I've used POPFile for a while but for whatever reason, it took ages to read the emails from 5 pop3 accounts while Spambayes does the same in a few seconds. I even played with POPFile's option of using multiple pop sessions to speed things up but it did not help. -- Best regards, Dick ___________________________________________________________ Those of you who think you know everything are very annoying to those of us who do. Using The Bat! v3.5.25 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Privacy is your right...only if you defend it: http://www.metropipe.net/landing.cgi?id=cloggy ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.5.26 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
