In reply to <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
AM> On Sunday, June 19, 2005 at 7:19:42 AM [GMT -0500], Avi Yashar wrote: >> Okay, this much I understand. What I don't understand is how the >> OTFE capability arose in the first place. Who installed TB with >> OTFE capability and chose the master password? AM> As Roelof indicated earlier, deleting your registry key and AM> restarting TB! will give rise to being prompted for OTFE or AM> unencrypted use. AM> Each new user logs into their XP/NT user space and start TB!. No AM> registry key for TB! has yet been written. They're prompted on AM> whether or not they wish to use OTFE. IMHO the requisites for OTFE should be reviewed. I see no benefit as defined today. Again, IMHO, OTFE should be defined on an email account basis, independently. AM> OTFE is all or none, in that you can't have one account using OTFE AM> encryption while another isn't. Ritlabs should change that ASAP. AM> Enabling OTFE encryption is enabling a feature like any other. AM> It's not like you've installed separate files for it and need to AM> tick a radio box to include whatever files are necessary to run AM> OTFE. It should be. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias Race Car spelled backwards is Race Car!!! ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.5.29 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
