Tony, On 20-06-2005 18:19, you [TB] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: TB> If RIT was to just own up and say "We don't know what's wrong and TB> we're not capable of fixing it" then that would be different. But TB> they just keep blanking me and denying all knowledge of my requests.
I, personally, have not experienced this but I think the point is that your problem maybe is not the most important from RitLabs from a business POV. We may neither think much of the new UI, but for RitLabs it might be a very good business decision to make this before IMAP. If you look back, you can also see a lot of posts from me complaining about IMAP when TB! suddenly became 3.0. But it is my experience that if you keep a fairly positive attitude and do all you can to help RitLabs with data, .etc., your issues are fixed faster. Note I say "faster" and not "fast". I presume there is a business manager who decides what gets priority. IMAP has been identified for this 3.5.x series - but RitLabs have also said that it will be a monster effort - so probably someone is already working on the problem. RitLabs have always said that people do different things and new UI does not necessarily mean that no-one is working on IMAP at the same time. I, too, am waiting for IMAP improvements. Your problem is that deleted messages are not removed from IMAP folders when you switch to another folder? That works here with Exchange and MailMax. -- <greeting> Best regards </greeting> <author> Peter Fjelsten </author> <thebat version> 3.5.21 Pro </thebat version><extras> MyGate, AVG </extras> <env.> ~11 POP3, 2 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 175K msgs. </env.> <os> Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 </os> ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.5.30 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
