Hi Mary,
MB> Whereas, Maxim had been announcing the previous few betas, 3.5.25,
MB> 3.5.26-29, and 3.5.30.
MB> So, I think 9Val did the misnumbering--or at the very least failed to
MB> catch it, of this beta 3.5.0.31--because he had been away and the
MB> change to th more "realistic" numbering system either escaped his
MB> notice or he had a temporary lapse, a typo sort of thing, when he
MB> either received the rar numbered with 0 (like 3.5.0.14 was), or
MB> actually typed it in while writing his part of the code for 3.5.0.31
MB> ([3.5.31], as I agree with you and others that it *should* be numbered.)
That's my fault, numbering system was changed and I without informing
about it thought, that missing zero was a typo. BTW, current numbering
system doesn't satisfy me, IMHO, it should be something like this:
3.50.31 (third zero jumped to second number), so if new release
wouldn't have enough changes to be 3.6, it could be numbered 3.51.xx.
I think it wouldn't be easy to end-user to understand if 3.5.45 is a
new release or still 3.5.3x fixes beta without being participated in
beta-testing.
--
9Val
________________________________________________________
Current beta is 3.5.31 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
