Hello Dwight A Corrin & everyone else, on 06-Jul-2005 at 21:53 you (Dwight A Corrin) wrote:
>> Without having read the whole thread, I just want to point out, that >> it's not always that mathematical and therefore logical as you did point >> out. CVS's numbering system for instance goes like this 1.1 ... 1.9 .... >> 1.10 .... 1.19 .... 1.20. That's the "opposite" of the way you >> described. > I think Windows went from 3 to 3.1 to 3.11 to 95 You've got to keep the "marketing number" and the internal version number apart at that point. 95 was internally numbered 4.xxx, 98 was 4.1998, second edition was 4.2222. NT4 was NT4, 2000 was NT5.0, XP is NT5.1, Server2003 is NT5.2 -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) Gravity doesn't excist - the earth sucks. ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.51 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
