Hallo Paul, On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 23:19:13 +0100GMT (24-7-2005, 0:19 +0200, where I live), you wrote:
PM> from the team. In my book both of these issues are quite PM> significant yet they haven't received a response yet. Am I wrong PM> to expect a reply or some classification at this stage? The best way to generate reactions to bugtrack items is to get them confirmed by more users. It's hard for Ritlabs to decide whether a report by one user is due to a fluke in his configuration or due to a bug. Therefore you'd best discuss items on this list and get confirmations. Unfortunately the MAPI/Exchange combination isn't very common used and thus it'll be hard to get those confirmations. IIRC the MAPI/Exchange stuff has been raised on TBUDL and a workaround was offered. PM> Where are we in the Beta cycle? Are there certain things that the PM> beta testers are asked to concentrate on? Anyway I'm sure you'll PM> help me through this. The beta testers are asked to concentrate on all errors and to use the latest beta. According to your x-mailer header you're not using a beta version at all, so you'd best check whether the bug is still existing with the latest beta. PM> PS Sorry for the first post which became threaded amongst another PM> thread because I replied to that by accident. I hope it's alright PM> to post again. Posting again is the best way to get more replies than the trout I served you. ;-) -- Groetjes, Roelof When you go to the market, use your eyes, not your ears. The Bat! 3.51.9 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM
pgpTCwIiPm6vP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.51.9 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
