Hello Jay,
JW> If this be so, when do you suppose RL will look into the issue
JW> involving the search engine hanging - for me, at least, whenever I try
JW> to implement OTFE? In other words, the same search in Non-OTFE runs
JW> fine; but after restoring from backup and trying to search the same
JW> directories (now under OTFE), the search takes forever.
Next beta serie. Slow and hanging search (even in non-OTFE mode) is
one of the major objectives.
JW> As I see it, this "clarification" is so vague as to make the initial
JW> announcement virtually meaningless. But I always considered the policy
JW> to be impractical (as you might notice from my responses a month ago).
Well, as I said before, it is very interesting question: idealistic
position is to wait your approval, realistic position is to release
when we need. And, as I said before, we have no fixed date releases.
This time we moved balance to the "our needs" side, next time it could
be on your side.
Note: no promises
JW> The main question I have now is only how much value to give to
JW> your "number 5" feature list - especially as I remain concerned
JW> about the search engine problem when moving from Non-OTFE to OTFE.
"Number 5" (and any other) doesn't contain any fixed feature list, it
reflects that version contains modified (or new) features comparing to
previous number. While 1 (from .51) means there is no major finished
changes, it is just the same more stable .50
JW> And, last but not least, can RL give assurance that we can use 3.51.10
JW> without worrying about the message content distortion and loss issues
JW> that were reported in the early releases of 3.51?
Yes, if you mean disappearing symbols from MicroEd
--
9Val
________________________________________________________
Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
