-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Marek,

MM> Saturday, August 20, 2005, NetVicious wrote:

>>> However, BayesIt still does a lousy job. It hardly ever finds
>>> any spam after a couple of months. I use K9 on my main
>>> machine, which seems a lot more efficient.

My wife, running v2 and an old version of BayesIt has good spam
catching performance.

Myself, running v3 and the latest version of BayesIt had many false
positives and failure to catch spam.


MM> I am testing new AGAVA AntispamServant plugin for The Bat!
MM> for a week and after two days of learning I have no false
MM> positive yet. It is fast and looks very good.

MM> But it is a shareware, discounted price for TB users is 20$
MM> or 15eur.

Previously I had been using Spambayes with very good performance but
after upgrading to a new PC and giving myself an account not The
Administrator I find Spambayes refuses to run.

I had never heard of AGAVA but I just d/l'ed it and am going to test
it.

- --
Best regards,
 Brian Marcotte

Using The Bat! v3.51.10 on Windows XP 5.| 1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP SDK 3.0.3
Comment: ""

iQA/AwUBQwfKJF0Izyy+kDY1EQKN1wCfVEK8tiYHNBOwjQtw2uXF502QDnQAoOed
7t9UmgQoiKGtcIT2Ps7zv4RX
=nihP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


________________________________________________________
 Current beta is 3.60.02 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Reply via email to