Peter Palmreuther schrieb: > HMdB> Not fixed: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4329 > > Which gets more and more important as process in developing > theoretical attack pattern against SHA-1 is advancing. In February > complexity to find two different text producing identical SHA-1 hash > was reduced from 2^80 to 2^69 rounds. Just a few days ago it was > further reduced to 2^63 rounds. Admitted, this is still no "tomorrow > all SHA-1 hash using signature are broken and insecure" thing, but I'd > say one should not wait with implementing correct behavior when > RIPEMD160 is used until SHA-1 was practically broken, and not just > theoretically.
Fully supported. Thank you for the details. Here is yet another example of a PGP/MIME signed message using RIPEMD160. -- Cheers Peter
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.60.02 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
