A Bat-fellow, Cees,
wrote on Sunday, 28th August 2005 at 21:20:28 (GMT +0200),
which was ditto in Bratislava --

>  Apparently I'm one of the lucky few?
>  I  totally love this plugin and it's working flawlessly overhere.

BayesIt is pathetic. After months of "training" it, these are the results:

> Spam frequency dictionary:
> °       Size: 26437 letters.
> °       Capacity: 552402 words.
> Non-spam frequency dictionary:
> °       Size: 148839 letters.
> °       Capacity: 2616667 words.
> 
> Last day statistic
> Errors
> °       SPAM errors (letters): 50%.
> °       SPAM errors (traffic): 54.12%.
> Last month statistic
> Errors
> °       SPAM errors (letters): 34.23%.
> °       SPAM errors (traffic): 40.21%.
> Current running version is 0.5.5

I agree, though, that TheBat and BayesIt are a perfect match:
their deficiencies are on a similar level. I think TheBat is the best
email software available, so this is about a "one-eyed king among
the blind".

-- 
Yours,
Alex. of Slovakia
www.avenarius.sk

[flying with The Bat! 2.12.00
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
amd athlon 2400 mhz & 704 mb ram]


________________________________________________________
 Current beta is 3.60.05 forerunner | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Reply via email to