Francis,

On 20-10-2005 08:32, you [FD] wrote in
<mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Umlauts denote a different vowel sound whereas the same diacritic
>> mark (the diaeresis in English) (š) in other languages, e.g. French,
>> denotes that vowels should be pronounced separately.

FD> Not always, Peter :-)

This is off-topic, so this will be my last post on the subject.

FD> In my sample, "poële" pronouces "poal" and not "powel" (in english)
FD> (different sound), but "Noël" prounouces "nowel" (in english).

I think this has more to do with the vowel after the following consonant
than the diaeresis.

You can read more about the ¨ diacritic mark here
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diaeresis>

-- 
<greeting> Best regards </greeting>  
<author> Peter Fjelsten </author> 
<thebat version> 3.61.12 Echo (Beta) Pro </thebat version>
<env.> ~4 POP3, 7 IMAP (UW IMAP 2002e) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 175K msgs. 
</env.>
<os> Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 </os>

  


________________________________________________________
 Current beta is 3.61.13 (Echo) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Reply via email to