-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hi,
ASK> So far, it is you alone who wants MicroEd to behave differently. Don't give me that. How many people on this list wanted the UI updates when the developement started for v3.5.x? Almost noone, all complained about unfixed bugs that should have been adressed before. Still, RIT had the opinion that a new UI would be more valuable to the average user than working on "silent code". I, too, don't agree with them, but they ought to know why they were doing it in this order. And now you want to tell me that because most of the experts participating in this list have adjusted to the TB-way it was "ok" to the standard user? I heavily disagree. Do you have any idea how many individuals whose computer system I service have enquired about this issue, to me alone? And can you imagine how satisfied they are when I have to tell them that no, it isn't a bug, they are just to stupid to use a feature correctly? The user decides what's a bug and what's a feature. What exactly the TB-way is might be a matter of debate, but a feature it for sure is not. An afterthought: vi is a great editor. I'm sure we can agree on that, can't we? But tell me: How many guys are using this great editor, even compared to notepad? Does RIT want all the vi-users to root for TheBat, or do they want to target all those using notepad? How often have we heard that while we on this list may not approve some developement decision, it is expected that the broad mass of average users will? And now, suddenly, this is not valid any more and the marketing target is the small expert group that applauds this TB-specialty? Come on. ASK> You consider it a bug [...] Not any more. You explained to me that it rather is a design flaw. Which of course is worse, because a bug tends to be fixable. ASK> Now, I for one refuse to have something "fixed" [...] Sometimes I wonder. Did you even read that what I was suggesting a user config option to switch to normal behaviour, not necessarily a removal of the TB-way? - -- MfG, AS mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP SDK 3.2.2 Comment: "Crypt by Alto M. Speckhardt" iQEVAwUBQ2dp1ksJWtsndbzVAQH8jQf9G7roTMh1lGtACpVD7BEWfGxUZ1CRMpmg uym8uUkJMk9J+dE26LKb8+7XRrQV7yHTAs4wac3hKXAsOsOzjyWXpkCWC/KE0liO B43eFwjaJoAUEXfMyMFAqNAUv+MSCGRnN3wO+EZSN4fNj+LLh0HUWxViKC9V9dcU +v9k5+rwIgW2dsEhE86ThyXUDNlpX5YqIRv+lEZQLGINnbvOlcQ78pJ25XdXH+T4 8lktyjE52UWcO93pw0ikj8uIUfV278UPzeTMtZB91YyC7U8QpuniEp2n0/bOZgoa g65tAu9Hu7AYoMPq4qC4Lz96RdPzHlCsgyVVkATusaK+mBRc95Uy4w== =QGhg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.62.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
