Recently, MAU squawked:
> Are you saying that this happens to you with any message you reply NO.. NO .. With that PARTICULAR header, or header (mal)formation, or UTF-8 or lack of email in " < > " .... I saw a lot of header differences between ones that (11) replies correctly to and the one I just got that it will not reply to. Build #10 DID reply to the miscreant header that I sent to the list. Build 11 does not. Thus, I conclude, there is some new way of interpreting headers to extract information. Or not. I dunno, I didn't program it. But it does not gather all the needed information to form a correct reply email in build (11). -- Robert D. _________________________ The Bat! Version: 3.62.11 Windows ME FireFox ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.62.11 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
