Hallo Nick, On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 11:09:42 -0600GMT (5-12-2005, 18:09 +0100, where I live), you wrote:
ND> When trying to restore a backup from my "main" TB! program Voyager ND> insists on writing the directories using the original path. Can't confirm that. Not the first time I restored a backup and not just now. Created a new instance of Voyager (this time on my local drive and not my USB drive) and restored my weekly backup. Everything went ok. ND> So in my original mail folder I end up with all the normal files ND> along with encrypted folders along side. If I make the original ND> path unreadable all I get is errors in Voyager telling me it can't ND> write to it - which it shouldn't be doing anyway! So you weren't using OTFE, that's a difference with me. Did you have all of your accounts stored in the same mail directory or were they in different locations? ND> I have not been able to get any common filters copied over to it. Can't comment on that as I don't use those. ND> If I just copy the folders from my main program over to the USB drive ND> and try to point Voyager to use that as the home for a new account it ND> doesn't recognize any of the content in those folders and just creates ND> a new empty account. I guess that could be because of the unencrypted format of your current accounts, because that's what I did for test purposes just now. You should realize though that Voyager needs the account directory to be stored in a subdirectory MAIL of the programdir. I tried it and got the message that a message base for Secure Bat! was encountered in the MAIL directory nd that it had a different encryption key (not true, same key) and subsequenty it was being opened just fine. ND> On some fresh installs I would end up with a program that wouldn't ND> allow any additions to filters. Any changes I made were lost between ND> sessions. What version did you use? All of my tests were run with the first voyager.zip extracted and the latest beta put on top of it. While running these tests I finally came up with two instances of Voyager installed on the same HDD, this didn't cause me any troubles. What I also tried was to run two instances of Voyager (from different locations) but that didn't work. Running Voyager and TB at the same time causes me no problem whatsoever. -- Groetjes, Roelof It is easier to catch flies with honey than with vinegar. The Bat! 3.63.06 (Beta) Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM
pgpiXqqS3LhEM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.63.06 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
