hi dwight, > so did I. If you are set to only spell check after you have told it to > send, then it is probably doing what you asked. I just ran the spell > checker to see if it would ignore everything or just the misspelling I > accepted, and whether it sent instead of stopping when I said to > stop,etc, and it was very well behaved.
after further testing, i may have the answer. i use plain text (windows) message format and can replicate my 'ignore all' = send message without further spell checking results every time i test. switching the message to plain text (microed) message format causes the 'ignore all' spell checker function to work as expected. that being so, i would guess that you're using plain text (microed) as your message format. although i don't use the html format, i tested spell checker under html format and found that it misbehaved as it did using the plain text (windows) format. i'd be interested in your findings should you decide to test further. thanks/regards, .. -- ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.63.08 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
