Hello Richard! On Monday, December 12, 2005, 1:34 AM, you wrote:
DAC>> I think the problem depends on the version message is created DAC>> in, not version viewed in. Richard Wakeford's rogue shows fine, DAC>> your doesn't, mine won't. > Yes, that's true and it doesn't matter which version it's viewed in. > If it's sent with 09 then there just aren't any rogues viewable. Yes. But my point was that it isn't simply that v. 3.63.09 ignores the X-Rogue line in my Address Book templates. I demonstrated that by typing my handle ( :mary: ) into the X-Rogue field. The pic didn't travel and no X-Rogue field was created in the Sent message. I was trying to narrow down the possible cause of the omission--in other words, where in the 3.63.09 code is the error? It's a significant omission. I hate this bug. -- Best regards, Please support the wish for a 'Draft' folder at: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5441 Mary The Bat 3.63.09 (Beta) on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.63.09 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
