Hello MAU, >>> They won't, I give up. They are stubborn, blind and don't have the >>> time to read our reasons. So, why waste our time and bother? >> >> I posted to Stefan that your purpose (as I understood it) in proposing >> a Draft folder, at this time, was that it was a more elegant, simpler, >> and intuitive way to protect the Outbox than implementing the new >> "Outbox Protection" feature. > You did understand very correctly, not like other(s) I won't mention :)
MAU!!! :))) I think, this is where we differ: I dont even THINK ABOUT protecting the Outbox using the current OPF. That is a dead-end, I think. Mail copy to Outbox should invoke a window for the user to remind him to the problems associated with same message ID, etc. What I debate is, that IF the Outbox would be protected that way, OR the starting point is 3.62.14, why -from my point of view- the Draft folder is unnecessary. You and others say, that you cannot distinguish between "Keep" mails and drafts. Each of them has park flag, right? My question: if this is the only problem, only cause you want a Draft folder, then my question: if there will be a Draft folder, do you store "keep" and drafts in them, also? In your wish you say: "Messages in Draft should always be Parked, just like they are now in Outbox". Also, your wish would not let messages in Outbox to have park flags... So: why the current system is wrong, where "parked" icon means that a message is a draft in the Outbox, no park flag means that it can be sent? -- Vili The Bat 3.62.14 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Szervizcsomag 2 ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.63.09 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
