Dear Mary, @7-Jan-2006, 16:58 -0600 (07-Jan 22:58 here) Mary Bull [MRB] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
>> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4933 >> This issue has been a complete PITA for me since it started playing >> up. It goes under the caption "Big problem with To field in QTs". >> The bug is nasty because there's not even a work-around for it. >> Nothing will let me assign the To header once it gets to a certain >> depth of nested operation. MRB> Then Miguel suggested in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MRB> "What about %SetHeader('To','[EMAIL PROTECTED]')? It is working for me." MRB> And you reported that you'd tried it and the work-around fixed your MRB> problem. Admirably. MRB> My question is: Did you have to re-do all your QT nested templates for MRB> the Address Book after the first appearance of the bug in v. 3.51.4? I had to correct every template that used the "%TO=...." construct. MRB> A friend has lost all the carefully customized nested QTs by upgrading MRB> to v. 3.64.03 from the Christmas Edition 3.64.01. That would be some other effect than the bug we were discussing. MRB> Dropping back from the new beta still left all the customized, nested MRB> QTs missing. Yes, I would expect so. It sounds like a bad file write or otherwise corrupted QT store files. MRB> NB to Stefan Tanurkov, to whom this open BT issue report is MRB> listed as assigned: Are you working on the bug right now--it's MRB> sort of serious for the more advanced users of The Bat! Has been MRB> lurking around since July 18, 2005. Yes. About that. -- Cheers -- //.arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator and fellow end user TB! v3.64.04 Christmas Edition on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2 '
pgpEZCOVCZduQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.64.03 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
