8/8/2006 2:59 PM Hi Gleason,
On 8/8/2006 Gleason Pace wrote: GP> Vilius, >> Hello Fabio, >> Tuesday, August 8, 2006, 7:36:38 PM, you wrote: >>> Hello tbbeta, >>> I have been using TB! for years with pop3 accounts, and now I'd >>> linke to switch to IMAP (on my own server). I have read lots of >>> negative comments about IMAP some months ago, then quite no more. >> That's because all active IMAP users left TB! for other email clients. GP> I'm surprised that you would think that. There are a number in GP> this list who use it, including me. I have two imaps and 3 pops. GP> The main imap account has 18,000 messages on the server. >> I switched to MS Outlook 2007 beta at work not long ago. It's GREAT. Outlook >> Express is great with IMAP too. GP> Yes, I have looked at outlook 2007 beta. No, I don't think it is even close to TB. OE stinks. >>> Is someone using TB with dovecot IMAP server and with folders >>> containing thousands (5000, 10000, 20000) of messages? >> Yes, I am using Cyrus and Dovecot IMAP servers with more than 50k >> messages. >>> Can (or should) TB! create a full local cache of messages (with >>> bodies too) to allow me to run TB! while disconnected? >> Yes TB! can create full local cache and you can browse messages while >> offline. But IMAP implementation in TB! is far from usable state. It's >> not even in beta state. Thank you for sending the truth of experience to dispel the smoke of ignorance and assumption. -- Take Care, Paul Voyager v.3.80.04 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195 No IMAP OTFE Opera 8.5 ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.81.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
