Hello Gary, On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 16:52:48 -0500 GMT (13/09/2006, 04:52 +0700 GMT), Gary wrote:
G> The protocol as you call it, (SSL, TLS) does not define that the certs have G> to be valid, never has. It is the client, TB!, that has decided for me not G> to accept it. It should be always up to the user to accept *any* cert. Every G> email client I have ever used with IMAP (about 30+ of them), over the last G> 10 years, allows one to accept a cert for whatever reason, if I so choose, G> either on a temp or permanent basis, EXCEPT TB! I don't know about IMAP. But I second the motion that the user should have the option to accept an invalid certificate, for whatever reason. It's the user's responsibility if he compromises his system, and I am certainly against being nannied by a software that is used by email professionals. -- Cheers, Thomas. SYMPTOM: Floor blurred. FAULT: You are looking through bottom of empty glass. ACTION: Get someone to buy you another beer. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 3.85.03 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
