Hello Alexander! On Sunday, October 08, 2006, 3:47 PM, you wrote:
>> Can anyone confirm the behavior? > As long as I haven't made any changes to the message body, I can change > the recipient, and the template will change with it. So I assume you had > already begun typing the actual message, and then changed the recipient. Well you are right, but I had only glanced down into the message body and seen that the greeting said "Hello ssis," so I put my sister's name in there. Only then did I glance up and see in the To field only the one word "ssis." As I told before, I did a back-space, tabbed down, the address went in, And I typed and sent my message. Unencrypted. Unintentionally unencrypted. Because I trusted my template, I did not pull down the Privacy menu and double check. It's too much to ask of my old brain, which is farther down toward entropy than I would like, to remember to check the Privacy menu every time I'm sending something encrypted, when it's such a usual thing with a particular person that habits are embedded. My work-around is not to use these handles any more for persons I encrypt to. And, to me, as an annoyance, it's on a par with the Draft function which does not conserve the PGP settings, because in one folder only--Outbox--folder settings over-ride Address Book settings. And the Outbox serves double-duty as a draft folder box. As soon as I type one thing into the message body of a saved-draft to edit it, "Encrypt when completed" is lost. And the one time I would forget to double-check the pull-down privacy menu would probably be when I was in correspondence with my accountant, or someone else about sensitive material. Stefan Tanurkov knows this drawback. But he won't give Miguel and me a separate Draft folder in which we can customize the settings. > Just tested it with my girlfriend as a recipient, who has a personal > address template, then changed the recipient to be you, and my standard > "english - personal" template was applied. You're correct. > As soon as I typed something in the message body, the template won't > change - this is correct IMHO, because you'd lose what you already wrote > when the new template is applied. You're correct. But both you and Paul are missing the issue that is meaningful to me, here. -- Best regards, Mary The Bat 3.86.02 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.86.02 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
