Hello MAU, On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 22:07:03 +0100 GMT (30/12/2006, 04:07 +0700 GMT), MAU wrote:
M> There is nothing wrong with encryption as such, it's just that I run TB M> without OTFE and I would like to have both running the same for easy M> synchronisation. If encryption was optional, I would try without it and M> probably end up using it. But, by principle, I don't like to be forced M> to use it. It is up to me to decide how important and 'secret' my data M> is. I agree with this, but as I said, I only use Voyager as a handy way to connect while travelling. The main TB! on the PCs download all mails after my return, so I don't need to synchronise. M> Aside of that I understand that, when using OTFE, folders (and file M> names?) in disk have 'funny unrecognisable names'. If it is true, I M> don't like that at all. Yes, OTFE does that, and it is inconvenient. However, in case of problems it will not hurt me to just delete all mail bases. It is not the main application, it is a very handy thing to have when travelling. -- Cheers, Thomas. It's paradoxical that the idea of living a long life appeals to everyone, but the idea of getting old doesn't appeal to anyone. -- Andy Rooney http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 3.95.6 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.95.06 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
