>> I  wish  for  an  Incoming  filter option with that I could change the
>> Subject, i.e. add a word before the actual subject. Maybe there should
> You are in bad company if you ask for incoming mails to be altered in
> any way. There is a strong lobby that is against it. I have asked for
> this possibilty (not with your specialisation, though), as have others.
> I am glad this comes up again.

Not everybody must like me :)) I cant go too much lower anyway :)) So,
until it is for the good cause...

>> Or  do  you  see  any solution how it could be done? 
> I add a header to incoming emails with X-Ray before TB has a chance to
> see them. 

I will check this! If that header info could be customized...

>> I have processing
>> filters  (fired  up  by  a filter, take the body of the message and do
>> something with it EXTERNALLY, e.g. extracting info into a file, etc.),
>> but  I  am  in  the need to modify the subjects... The only solution I
>> see:  when  the  filter is fired, extract the mail into MSG, trigger a
>> processing program with some parameter (setup file name, that contains
>> the word, the separator, the digits and the counter) and use a command
>> line  parameter  in  that  program  to force TB to import the modified
>> file.  Brave  enough  people can even move the original mail into some
>> "Processed mail" folder in their account.
> The opponents of incoming mail editing say that incoming mails
> shouldn't be edited, it would be unethical.

Oh,  crying  out loud... Please. "Unethical". Server side spam filters
do  it every day. I did not follow the thread, so if I hurt some of my
good  buddies  here: it is a discussion for me. Also, I have to admit,
at  5am,  if I dont see cars approaching the intersection and I have a
red  lamp,  well,  I stop, carefully examine the scene (yes, for those
kind  of  cars,  too :), and go thru the red. It is a practical thing.
Rules  are  made to make the lives easier and to be bent if necessary.
(Ok, I am a research scientist, so I HAVE TO bend the rules... :))

> But there is no doubt that editing (even automatically) is possible,
> one  only  has to use the workaround with external files. I wouldn't
> see an ethical issue if this could be done from within TB.

Me neither. So I will do it :)

-- 
Vili


________________________________________________________
 Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to