8/22/2007 2:57 PM Hi Rick,
On 8/22/2007 Rick Grunwald wrote: RG> but there ARE some inconsistencies with the way some RG> things are implemented. I have had issues (sorting and threading if I RG> remember correctly) where it did not work the way it SAID it should RG> work. Too many were quick to jump in and tell me it was supposed to RG> work that way - even in the face of a contrary description. Just RG> because someone has DONE it that way for a long time does not make the RG> reasoning correct. Agreed, I have also been irritated by seemingly irrational behavior. That is not the point however, rather it is the method of dealing with it. This guy just joined the club and wants TB! to act like his old habits and bashes when it doesn't and spews volumes to describe something that could be expressed in a well thought sentence. RG> He mentioned perceived problems. I don't use MAPI so we should have RG> banished all those issues to another list because I don't particularly RG> need to hear them? Does every email on this list give valuable RG> information? I don't think so. See above. RG> Then I want my DELETED VIEW TAB!!! :)) I supported this too. Honey attracts more flies than vinegar. -- Take Care, Paul Voyager v.3.99.4 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195 No IMAP OTFE ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.99.20 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
