Hello Marek, On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 17:13:24 +0100 GMT (02/01/2008, 23:13 +0700 GMT), Marek Mikus wrote:
>> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3319 MM> nice idea, but as I think, worse to implement it. MM> 1) If You will have one entry and one filters tree, how You will MM> select order of filters for every type? As is been now now: From top to bottom. If you need in Incoming filter to be processed in a different order than an Outgoing filter (I wouldn't know why), you can still create seperate ones. In fact, you can work the same way you work now, if you tick only "Incoming" in one set, and only "Outgoing" in another. The wish will *allow* you (not force you) to make a filter have both conditions. MM> 2) filters for Read/Replied messages have folder selection, so all MM> filter types will share same folders MAU already mentioned that Read/Reply filters are somewhat different. I don't know about that. For me, Incoming/Outgoing filters are the important ones, where I have tons of duplicatations which I need to update manually. MM> 3) I see option "Continue processing with other filters" unusable MM> in such scheme! Why? I don't see any change to the existing system, except that we have a choice of using the same filter for both Incoming and Outgoing messages. -- Cheers, Thomas. "It's never okay to kiss a boy. They always slobber all over you .....that's why I stopped doing it." (Jean, 10) http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 4.0.0.5 (ALPHA) under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.99.29 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
