On Wednesday, January 16, 2008, 11:26:10, Peter Hampf wrote:

>> Because they'll either be noisy (due to the way JPEG compression works),
> come on. JPG works perfectly for most - if not all - screenshots. We don't
> need artwork here.

For artwork, JPEG is ideal - not so for screenshots.

>> or much larger than the PNG equivalents.
> That depends!

Look at these samples:
http://eternallybored.org/imgs/pngjpg/thebat.png - 30kB
http://eternallybored.org/imgs/pngjpg/samesize.jpg - 33kB
http://eternallybored.org/imgs/pngjpg/visible.jpg - 134kB

The PNG file is 30kB without me even trying. If I try to save the
image as JPEG of the same size, the result is invisible mess, where
you can't even read most of the text. Even the 4 times larger JPEG is
still visibly lower quality than the PNG file.

I'm CCing this to tbot, since it's not really relevant here anymore.

-- 
< Jernej Simončič ><><><><>< http://deepthought.ena.si/ >

[The Bat! v4.0.0.11 (ALPHA) on Windows XP Professional x64 Edition 
5.2.3790.Service Pack 2]

Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it only makes it worse.
       -- Finagle's Fourth Law


________________________________________________________
 Current beta is 4.0.0.11 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to