Vili,

>>> So, when will Ritlabs finish working on these nuances (QT, etc.) and
>>> focus on IMAP?
>> I do not think, there will be nuances in templates system only, but agree,
>> IMAP must be focused.

> Sorry  for  the misunderstanding. I meant, that for me, QT was good as
> it was (ok, now better), so first the real problematic areas should be
> targeted,  including  IMAP.  It is like washing a car while you have a
> broken engine... Yes, it will be shinier, but should not we repair the
> engine first???

The Bat Imap for me has been slowly improving over the past couple of
years.   Right now, I am seeing no Connection Center lockups, no
messages that don't load, no necessity to shut The Bat down because it
has stopped responding to Imap commands.

Right now, I would say that TB has the best Imap anywhere, including
Thunderbird and Mulberry.

But I do use server side filters.

-- 
 Gleason                            

 Using 4.0.24.25 on Windows XP, 5.1, Build 2600.
 IMAP email provider is Fastmail, which uses Cyrus server software.


________________________________________________________
 Current beta is 4.0.24.25 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to