[Reply to: »Marek Mikus« · 2009-06-08 · 01:21 h (CET)] Moin!
>>> And: I think someone with knowledge about that posted that 4.2 >>> will be the version with IMAP working. Obviously that was >>> marketing. > nobody told this, Sorry, but IMHO these statements do not allow any diversity in interpretation: > .·¨[Stefan Tanurkov @ TBB, 2008-10-30]¨·. > ·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·— > VŠ> Can someone from Rit update us on where IMAP rewrite is? > > We've made changes to the message base format in order to improve > IMAP in the next release, so it was the first step. As soon as we > get this Beta series finished and the new format working without a > problem, IMAP will be reworked. > ·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·— => <msgid:1124908893.20081030210...@thebat.net> > .·¨[Maxim Masiutin @ TBB, 2008-12-19]¨·. > ·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·— > […] Please note that this fix is not related specifically to IMAP, > it is only a workaround of inefficient IMAP design. We will rework > IMAP after the release. > ·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·— => <msgid:2033284972604811...@ritlabs.com> > 4.2 is minor upgrade with more bugfixes than additions, yes, > postponed sending is available, but there are importans bugfixes and > this is reason this version was released as final. IMHO RITLabs does not make any difference between major and minor releases: Release is release. The mentioned above statements were done during 4.1.x series, so the "next" release would be 4.2.x, i.e. *this* release. By the way wasn't it you, who had the same opinion some months ago? > .·¨[Marek Mikus @ TBB, 2008-12-10]¨·. > ·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·— > > Speaking of IMAP, I thought this was the IMAP fixing time. > > as Stef wrote some weeks ago, IMAP will be focused in development > serie after 4.1 (current serie) will be finished. > ·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·— => <1127313245.20081210161...@ipex.cz> Why is it often so hard for people to admit, that something (repeatedly) went wrong? >> IIRC, IMAP development will be continued AFTER the establishment of >> the new database format. Which could mean anytime, from v. 4.1 >> onward until v. 68876589.3245234.12341231.00457734 onward. > and it continued, even it is not visible yet. I can not tell more, > Stef should do clear statement. Yep, a binding statement from RITLabs would be highly appreciated! Just for clarification: I am using four POP3 accounts and only one IMAP account. I have sometimes little problems (aka "pet peeves") with IMAP, but no real showstoppers. But obviously there are a lot of people, who have *serious* problems with IMAP support. So, dear RITguys, please hear the voice of the customer! Just my two cents … Cheers! VA - -- Volker Ahrendt | q...@ahrendt.net Direct eMail without [tbb] in subject line will end in Nirvana! Using /\^o^/\! 4.2.4 [Pro] on Windows XP [Pro] Service Pack 3. »Smart alecks are the roots of all evil.« – Mika M. Kruse ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 4.2.4 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
