Hi Mark, MW> Probably doesn't much matter. In the example those two functions are MW> just do-nothing stubs anyway.
Well, they are called when the plugin is loaded/unloaded. If you do everything at the DLL entry, you simple should not implement them - their absence is not critical. MW> My only thought was that there was some Object Pascal glue that MW> needed to see those two functions in the DLL. There is nothing from Object Pascal here. DLL is DLL :-) Did you work out what was wrong with the call convention? I think you just should add "stdcall" in TBP_XXX function declaration (if I remember it right, BC++ does not require underscores, but I can be wrong). Also, somebody knows whether "WINAPI" may replace "stdcall" ? -- Cheers, Stefan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ...I don't suffer from insanity. I enjoy every minute of it. ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBDEV" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
