Hi Task,

On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, at 21:10:14 [GMT -0400] (which was 6:10 PM where
I live) you wrote:
TC> maybe you can filter using the name of the table of codification,
TC> i think you can find it in the raw message.

Yeah, that's probably how I'll have to do it. Thanks.

TC> �why you are not using "vampire"? i was abandoned the developed of
TC> pacspam because, ... in the pacspam page you can find the explain.
TC> You can use your pacspam list in vampire.

LOL. I am, sorry, I just got used to the name PACSPAM. I am using
Vampire. I'll try to keep it straight from now on. ;-)

TC> if you put the list of words in the body, the plug'in can say: "it
TC> is spam", you know, �a lot of words from spam! please zip it (or
TC> rar it) when you send.

That's true (although my message I just sent to the TBDEV list will
explain how I'm getting around that problem). But from now on, I'll
send them as a text attachment.

Again, thanks for the hard work.

BTW, I thought you had mentioned releasing the source for the plugin.
Are you still planning that? I would love to look at it. I don't know
much programming, but I'd love to play with it.

Thanks.


-- 
Cheers,
Leif Gregory 

List Moderator (and fellow registered end-user)
PCWize Editor  /  ICQ 216395  /  PGP Key ID 0x7CD4926F
Web Site <http://www.PCWize.com>
TB FAQ   <http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/FAQ.html>
Using The Bat! 1.63 Beta/6 under Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 
on a P4 1.6Ghz OC'd to 2.32Ghz with 512MB.

Tagline of the day:
Flashlight:  A case for holding dead batteries.




________________________________________________
Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBDEV" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to