Hello Jonathan, > Take a look at the section in RFC2822 (the one that replaces RFC822) > about the section on folding headers, that'll detail all the > information about it. The only thing I'm not sure about is the length > of that first line, it seems very long, I cannot remember the length, > but I think it's supposed to only be up to 78 characters for header > lines, I'd have to double check.
Actually this comment is mainly for Andrew since I am the one who reported the problem to him. I don't know if it is relevant or not but, just in case, take a look at the References header in the original message (received) I replied to: Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> There is no blank line after References. However, if I look at my reply while in the Outbox, the blank line is there. Look: In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Could this be then a problem in The Bat! ? -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.01.3 ________________________________________________ http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
