> From: Mike Detwiler [mailto:j.michael.detwi...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 4:34 AM > > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Mike Detwiler <j.michael.detwi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Cihula, Joseph > > <joseph.cih...@intel.com> wrote: > >>> From: Mike Detwiler [mailto:j.michael.detwi...@gmail.com] > >>> Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2011 3:31 AM > >>> > >>> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 12:41 AM, Cihula, Joseph > >>> <joseph.cih...@intel.com> wrote: > >>> >> From: Mike Detwiler [mailto:j.michael.detwi...@gmail.com] > >>> >> Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 6:22 PM > >>> >> > >>> >> Hi, just wondering if anyone had any thought on this. > >>> > > >>> > Tboot does not have EFI support. In addition to what it would > >>> > need to do with regards to > >>> getting the memory map and ACPI tables, it would also need to fill > >>> in the OsSinitData.EfiRsdtPtr with the correct value (and this being 0 is > >>> what is generating > the SINIT error). > >>> > >>> Thanks for the response, Joe. Does this imply that the current i5/i7 > >>> SINIT ACM available from sourceforge has all the bits necessary for > >>> EFI, and as soon as tboot support is added everything should work? > >> > >> Correct (again, patches welcome ;-). > > > > We're definitely looking into that and will let you know if we get > > something working. > > We're using 64-bit EFI/grub2. Is there anything that would prevent TXT and > tboot from functioning > properly if we were to successfully port tboot from 32-bit to 64-bit?
Not that I'm aware of. Joe ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev _______________________________________________ tboot-devel mailing list tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tboot-devel
