Without this delay, Xen could not bring APs up while working with TXT/tboot, 
because tboot need some time in APs to handle INIT before becoming ready for 
receiving SIPIs. (this delay was removed as part of c/s 23724 by Tim Deegan)

Signed-off-by: Gang Wei <gang....@intel.com>

diff -r d1aefee43af1 xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c
--- a/xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c    Wed Dec 21 18:51:31 2011 +0800
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c    Wed Dec 21 19:08:57 2011 +0800
@@ -463,6 +463,10 @@ static int wakeup_secondary_cpu(int phys
             send_status = apic_read(APIC_ICR) & APIC_ICR_BUSY;
         } while ( send_status && (timeout++ < 1000) );
     }
+    else
+    {
+        mdelay(10);
+    }

     /*
      * Should we send STARTUP IPIs ?

Attachment: delay-btw-init-and-sipi.patch
Description: delay-btw-init-and-sipi.patch

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Write once. Port to many.
Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create 
new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the 
Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev
_______________________________________________
tboot-devel mailing list
tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tboot-devel

Reply via email to