Hei,
Alexander Leschinsky wrote:
ND>> Just out of curiosity, why would a font that makes it easy to read a
ND>> few messages suddenly become hard to read for a lot of messages?
> It's a part of science "typographics" and (partially) - physiology
May I sum up your statement "proportional fonts are bad for reading loads
of text"?
I always wonder when this discussion comes up that so many people defend
fixed fonts. Have you ever looked in a book or in a newspaper? There's not
a single one which has fixed fonts - simply because proportional fonts are
much better to read. This also applies to screen reading, as I can see for
myself when comparing my reading speed in TB! and in Agent. But of course
every individual has it's own preferences - I think 99% of ascii art is as
boring as "standard" signatures - so that's no argument for _me_. Best
solution would be to simply give the user the choice, and if I remember
right V2 will bring us this choice.
--
Regards, G�nther
German TB! faq, and cut.exe - delete ads in mails
http://www.guenther-eisele.de/bat/
TheBat! 1.53bis, Windows NT 5.0
--
______________________________________________________
Archives : <http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com>
Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
