On Saturday, September 22, 2001 Allie C Martin wrote:
[...]
> The plain text viewer is still available for those uninterested in the
> RTFV.
Like me for example :)
OK... but I don't have full functionality - as it is in RTFV
viewer (I'm talking about color schemes).
JW>> I'd like to see signatures in a different color and even quoted
JW>> text in a different color... and I don't like Rich Text/HTML
JW>> viewer because it's slow, very slow...
> Apparently implementing this sort of thing in the plain text viewer is
> very difficult, hence the move to another viewer.
Oh, is it? Really? I don't think so... but I am not a
programmer. Just want to say that recognizing a signature is
not so difficult "-- \n" - that's all - everything after
that should be in a chosen color. Difficult? Maybe...
Same with recognizing ">>" or ">" - what's difficult about
it? If it was so difficult we wouldn't have any coloring in
the fixed font width... but we have - all quotes for
example...
[...]
> I do appreciate the slowness at this time. It's still in beta so we
> don't know what it will be like when fully optimised. I already see
> that it's faster in beta 9.
but still to slow to accept it.
regards,
--
/\_/\ Go ahead, jump. 100,000 lemmings can't all be wrong.
(~o o~)
)'Y'( __________________________________________________________________
( ) / Jacek Wojaczynski The Bat! 1.54 Beta/9 under Windows 95 \
--
______________________________________________________
Archives : http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
