-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Chris,
On 12 January 2002 at 08:43:26 +0100 (which was 07:43 where I live) Chris Lilley wrote to Jernej Simon�i� and made these points: JS>> This will not only remove [name], but will also take care or Re: JS>> RE: [group] Re: and similar. > On a related topic to that coment: > Where is the Re[n] converion defined (eg, some RFC or other) because > my sysadmin has asked to to set The Bat! to not do that, on the > grounds that RFC 822 does not list this convention. That's not actually true. The RFC puts no constraint on the way Subject: header content is used. Your sysadmin shouldn't have any cause to complain about the content of the message body or pre-amble unless it really does contravene the RFCs. "Re[n]" does not contravene any. > I assume ther is a good reason for it though and it seems useful, so > I would prefer to point my sysadmin at some specification that The > Bat! is complying with ... any ideas? It is not a specification. It may have come from FIDO, but it's very "Bat!". I actually turned it off completely myself very early on and have left it that way. All of my templates use the %SINGLERE macro to do that. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ \ BrainStorm - free thinking - www: http://www.brainstormsw.com / \ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com / � TB! v1.54 Beta/26-14F4B4B2 on Windows NT 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 � -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32) iD8DBQE8QCGwOeQkq5KdzaARAkZEAJ9Q45aa1mnHDDiMJEp8DSjq6R2oQQCePiDl wi/v5o08MwLnsFfY7qJJLt0= =sshc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- ______________________________________________________ Archives : http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
