Hello Norbert, On Thursday, April 11, 2002 at 5:10:54 PM you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part):
NL> so You think this issue is of interest for _every_ TB! user? Nearly ... :-) NL> I strongly disagree ;-) additional header lines is IMHO quite NL> technical... Nope ... ask TBUDL ... nearly every one wants to set an 'X-My-Mailer-is-the-Best: The Bat!' header *LoL* No ... to be honest: the question for additional header is regularly coming up and it is in fact 'of public interest' this ain't (yet) possible. With 'deeper technical discussions' discussions about e.g. high complex regular expression macros are covered or RFC related stuff. This are discussions a 'user' as in 'to use' is not interested in and therefore TBUDL ain't used for this kind of talk (normally *G*). Requests for a special function is of public interest, as long as it is not the detailed technical explanation how this should work and/or look :-) BTW: the number of subscribed people on TBTECH is _significant_ lower than TBUDL. So one day in your live you won't even get an answer here on TBTECH because the few people reading here are not present, but on TBUDL chances are higher you will be satisfied :-) So far ... Pit -- Regards Peter Palmreuther mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (The Bat! v1.60c on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2) A fool must now and then be right by chance alone. ______________________________________________________ Archives : http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
